Note on the English translation of The Old Manchu ChroniclesMark C. Elliott, EditorThe Old Manchu Chronicles, more commonly known as the Manbun rōtō or the Manwen laodang, constitute the annals of the Manchu (Jurchen) state in the first part of the seventeenth century.As such, they are the most valuable single original source on the early history of the Qing dynasty (1636-1912).The need for a complete and reliable English translation of The Old Manchu Chronicles seems obvious, particularly given the renascent interest in the Inner Asian roots of the Qing.This translation aims to meet that need.The Chronicles are composed entirely in the Manchu language.Their original title is tongki fuka sindaha hergen-i dangse, or “records in the script with dots and circles added.”This script, often referred to as the “pointed script,” was devised in the course of the 1620s and 1630s and makes use of diacritical marks to clearly differentiate certain vowel and consonant sounds.It was based on the unpointed script, i.e., that without dots and circles (tongki fuka akū hergen), which was borrowed from Mongolian at some point no later than 1599.(Prior to 1599 there was no system for writing Manchu.)The abbreviation RPS will be used in this translation for the title “Records in the Pointed Script.”These materials have long been available in an annotated, complete, and authoritative Japanese translation, which reproduces in transcription the Manchu text.1This translation is based on the version of the Chronicles recopied in 1778 from an earlier set produced in 1775, and stored in the Chongmo ge 崇謨閣 in the Qing palace at Mukden (modern Shenyang), where they were discovered in 1905 by Naitō Torajiro.Under Naitō’s direction they were photographed there in 1912.The plates were brought to Japan and remain in the possession of Kyoto University.The original text must be presumed today to be part of the collection of the Shenyang Palace Museum.A Chinese translation is also available, though regrettably without notes of any kind and without the reproduction of the original text.2This translation is based on the version of the Chronicles that was recopied in 1775 on the orders of the Qianlong emperor and kept thereafter in the vault of the Grand Secretariat (neige daku 內閣大庫).It is now in the First Historical Archives, Beijing.This 1775 copy was itself based upon the original, unpointed, version of the Chronicles produced in the years before the Qing conquest.This original version, known widely as the Jiu Manzhou dang (JMD) is presently housed in the National Palace Museum in Taipei.It has been published twice in facsimile, once in 1969 and again in 2005.Because The Old Manchu Chronicles is a lengthy work, it can be expected that it will be a matter of several years before it is complete.The translators have decided that it would be best to make available the translations of individual chapters of the work as they are finished.Thus the passage of time will see the addition of further chapters on this site.The translation is the work of the following people (in alphabetical order): David Brophy, Natalie Köhle, Max Oidtmann, Jonathan Schlesinger, Brian Tawney, and Kwanghoon Yu, under the editorial supervision of Mark Elliott.Comments and corrections are welcome, and should be directed to the webmaster or directly to the editor at elliott3@fas.harvard.edu.
The Old Manchu Chronicles(2)
Note on the English translation of The Old Manchu Chronicles(2)Users of these pages should please note the following information: The text used for this translation is that published in seven volumes by Kanda Nobuo et al., in Manbun rōtō 滿文老檔/Tongki fuka sindaha hergen i dangse. The full text is also available electronically at http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu/~mnch210a/mbrt.cgi. It Proper names and special terms and titles, e.g., Sure Kundulen Khan, amban, niru, remain for the most part untranslated. Similarly, terms liable to multiple meanings, e.g., gurun, banjiha doro, etc., are also left untranslated or, when translated, are also provided in brackets. Page numbers in the original text are indicated in smaller type within parentheses, thus (25). These correspond to the numbers given in the Toyo Bunko edition. Because of the substantial differences in word order between English and Manchu, the placement of these numbers does not always correspond exactly to their placement in the Toyo Bunko edition. The Romanization system used in transcribing Manchu words and names is that of P.G. von Möllendorff, as modified by Jerry Norman. Where there are gaps in the original text, this is so indicated. In those instances where the text seems open to more than one interpretation, the appropriate text is underlined and alternate interpretations are provided in a footnote. In those instances where the text departs in marked fashion from the text in the Jiu Manzhou dang, this is also indicated by underlined, footnoted text. There are no paragraphs in the original text. All paragraphing is the result of editorial decision and is done for the convenience of the reader. Breaks in the original text, usually occurring with a new date, are indicated by a birga-type circle (the symbol used in the original). Fascicle numbers (e.g., Records in the Pointed Script 1) are those given in the original. There are 81 fascicles covering nineteen years of the reign of Taizu (Nurhaci), from 1607 to 1626, and 99 fascicles for the reign of Taizong (Hong Taiji), the latter being divided between the Tiancong 天聰 and Chongde 崇德 eras, corresponding to 1627-1635 and 1636-1643, respectively. January 2006Last updated August 20061 Manbun rōtō 滿文老檔 /Tongki fuka sindaha hergen i dangse (The secret chronicles of the Manchu dynasty, 1607-1637). 7 volumes. Kanda Nobuo et al., trans. Tokyo: Tōyō Bunko, 1955-1963.
To help the Manchus find their place in the world and to introduce the Manchus to the world
Translate
网页浏览总次数
搜索此博客
热门帖子
-
大清国灭亡后,从伪满洲国到今天的伪少数民族,从满遗到今天的满畜;今天浑浑噩噩,醉生梦死;香臭不分的活二逼满族人们真的知道辛亥革命双十节是在庆祝什么吗?在辛亥革命时,只要被抓到跟我们如今「标准国语」一样口音的人,就是满人要抓去处决——这是一场不下于纳粹的种族屠杀,台湾人...
-
满族是一个独特的民族,根据汉人的历史其历史可溯源到先秦。作为独立的民族称谓开始于1636年[1],有文字的历史至今也只有四百多年[2],而在其入主中原后,满语又渐渐式微,现在成为很少人用的“死”语言。但其保留的丰富的民间文化和历史资料却有着极高的价值和迷人的魅力。在生活的各个...
-
摘要: 满族作为曾经建立过中国最后一个封建王朝的民族, 不仅创造了自己的文字——满文, 而且将满文作为清朝的法定文字来推广和使用, 形成了大量的满文古籍文献。这些满文古籍文献是通古斯满洲民族文化遗产的有机组成部分, 具有重要的文化价值。本文就满文及其古籍文献作一综述, ...
-
1500万人口的满族作为全中国第二大少数民族没有本民族的自治区 自治州,在满语教学投入方面与国家在西藏,新疆,内蒙古等民族自治区的教育投入相比就是零投入;满族人对自己民族语言,文化的现状的淡漠无视和无知,政治方面没有也根本不敢有诉求,或者说也不知道要诉求什么;经济方面...
-
东北亚渔猎原住民族满洲族旧有的礼俗,有所谓“请安礼”、“抱见礼”。请安礼在入关后一直实行,且广泛施用于君臣之间、官场之中及一般旗人之间。而抱见礼,则“以抱不雅驯”而遗弃,只在某些礼仪中保留一点形式,作为满族君臣在特定场合中的一种礼节。另外,征服中国入关前的满族体现着满...
-
阿尔泰语系通古斯满洲民族是一个世世代代生活在东北亚“亚洲鸡冠”的打渔狩猎民族,在长期的生活和与大自然的接触中形成了一系列自己民族独特的衣食住行习惯和风俗,而汉人的文化根本不是满族人的文化,汉人的历史根本也不是满族人的历史,他们的民风民俗也根本不是满族...
-
建州女真爱新觉罗氏的努尔哈赤,曾于1616年建立了后金政权,成为英明汗、聪睿汗、清太祖,并于1625年从辽阳迁都沈阳。他的继承人皇太极,成为天聪汗、清太宗后,于1636年改国号为“大清”,从此开启了大清封建王朝的朱门,终使沈阳成为“一朝发祥地,两代帝王都”的东北锁钥重地。《...
-
Mark C. Elliott is the Mark Schwartz Professor of Chinese and Inner Asian History at Harvard University. Mark C. Elliott is the Mark ...
-
The author of this book, Professor Herbert Allen Giles (1845 - 1935) was a British diplomat officially stationed in China between 18...
-
Note on the English translation of The Old Manchu ChroniclesMark C. Elliott, EditorThe Old Manchu Chronicles, more commonly known as the Man...
订阅:
博文评论 (Atom)

没有评论:
发表评论